Friday, December 11, 2009

Mark Ingram is Primed for the Heisman

On Saturday, the Heisman Trophy will be given out to the “most outstanding player” of the 2009 season. Is there a clear-cut candidate that has trumped everyone and showed dominance throughout this season? Before the season, I wrote about how it will be a three-way dance for the Heisman: Tim Tebow, Colt McCoy, and Sam Bradford. However, Tebow has had a down year, nothing close to his 2007 Heisman year, McCoy has been up and down this season and pretty much killed his shot with a poor display against Nebraska, and Braford re-injured his shoulder, that required surgery, and he is off to the NFL. I know everyone is clamoring over defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh from Nebraska; rightfully so, he finished the season with 12 sacks (four coming against McCoy) with a total of 82 tackles (47 solo). But the Heisman has only been won by one defensive player and that was Charles Woodson in 1997. I have a hard time seeing a defensive player winning the coveted award unless that player does something really exceptional every game and has the backing from the media. I have to say that the trophy will be contested between two dynamic running backs: Mark Ingram of Alabama and Toby Gerhart of Stanford. If I had a vote, it would go to Ingram. He has meant the world to an Alabama team that has been struggling on offense for much of the season. Quarterback Greg McElroy has been shaky throughout the season and has benefitted from his sophomore running back. Ingram finished the season with 1542 yards and 15 touchdowns. On the other hand, Gerhart finished with an outstanding 1736 yards and 26 touchdowns on the ground. If you look at the stats, Gerhart gets the nod. Mind you, I love Gerhart and his tough no-nonsense approach of running over and through defenders. But he is on a Cardinal team that has four losses and the team is on the West Coast. People outside of the West Coat do not get to see Pac-10 games, or they are aired very late. Ingram benefits from playing in the SEC which is probably the most watched conference. Pac-10 games are showed on Versus (which is not available to DIRECTV owners anymore) and FSN. But you have many replays of SEC games on ESPN, ESPN2, and ESPNU, CBS network, and CBS College Sports channel. The sheer availability of SEC games allows the nation to fall in love with Ingram. Ingram’s defining moment was in the SEC Championship game against Florida, a game where Alabama dominated the Gators for four quarters. Coming off a disappointing game against Auburn (30 yards of rushing), he had to prove to the nation that he is an elite-caliber running back and he did. He had a 113 yards rushing and three touchdowns with 76 yards receiving. And Gerhart’s defining moment was the ABC primetime game against a very game Notre Dame team. He finished the night with 205 yards and three touchdowns. Clearly, we see Gerhart again trumping Ingram, but the level of competition comes into play as well. Florida is a better defensive team than The Fighting Irish, and no one can dispute that and also the number of athletic kids in the Southeastern Conference allows for a higher level of competition. But if you average out the run defenses that Ingram and Gerhart have played against, it comes out to: Ingram has played against rush defenses that average 66th in the nation, and Gerhart has rumbled against rush defenses that have averaged 59th in the nation. This shows that the SEC has not been that dominant in defense, especially rush defense this year and it also shows the how good the Pac-10 teams have been at defending against the run. However, I stick to my guns and say that Ingram deserves it. Even last year, running behind Glen Coffee, he was dynamic. He sports a good blend of speed and power. No, he does not running a blazing sub-4.3in the 40 like Chris Johnson (former East Carolina player now with the Tennessee Titans), but he gets those tough yards and has breakaway speed as well. Think about it, when a kid practices against a top 5 defense, he cannot help but be a tough running back. Ingram has willed his team to stay undefeated and get that revenge match with Florida and go to the national title game. And he was the prime reason that Alabama accomplished all those feats. It is really nice to see two young gentlemen being represented for their hard work: Ingram is the quiet guy who has been deflecting Heisman talk all season long, and Gerhart is the humble kid that never thought his name would be in the same sentence as “Heisman.” Ingram has a chance to be the first ever Alabama player to hold this prestigious award.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

And So…The Fat Lady Sings

Charlie Weis’ stint at Notre Dame has come to an end. When someone gets fired, it is not a time for celebration. But I can assure you that Fighting Irish fans in South Bend and across the nation are happy that he is gone; the message boards and forums have been calling for Weis to be removed after their loss to Navy. And it became more emphatic to the nation that Charlie would be relieved of his duties once they lost to Stanford, with Toby Gerhart putting on another impressive performance. Weis did not make friends when he arrived in South Bend. He rode in like a desperado all clad in black but instead of brandishing a gold-plated six shooter it was his Super Bowl rings that he blinded us all with; he was often deemed indifferent and arrogant to Notre Dame-backers, boosters, and the media. Weis was the ultimate pro wrestling “heel” (bad guy): he was no different than the Iron Sheik or Greg “The Hammer” Valentine. However, in his last two years there was a softer Charlie, a man that was more comfortable with himself and goofy at times. We know how much he has meant to the New England Patriots and Tom Brady: former sixth round pick and eventual Hall of Famer. He helped developed Brady into a star quarterback for those hated New Englanders. So why wouldn’t Notre Dame go after the “sexy pick” after unsuccessful seasons with Bob Davie and Tryone Willingham? But what happened was something no one saw: 35-27 in his five year tenure. Davie ended up with two fewer losses than Weis, in a five year span, and Willingham, in his three years, ended with a 21-15 record. The biggest Achilles heel for the Fighting Irish has been their defense. The defense finished the year ranked 87th in the nation: surrendering, on average, 397.95 yards per game. On the flip side of this, they were ranked 10th in total offense, averaging 451.75 yards per game. It’s good to have an offense and Drew Brees can attest to that (sorry for the NFL reference), but if you cannot get the boys on defense to make crucial stops then you lose those close bittersweet games: they have lost the last six games by an average of 4.6 points. They are hardly a team that is getting creamed week in and week out. Notre Dame assumed that Weis would be the messiah that would bring back the storied tradition of coaches: Knute Rockne, Frank Leahy, Ara Parseghian and Lou Holtz. However, it is unrealistic for them to put that kind of pressure on him or any coach. Those years of ten to eleven win seasons are long gone. And who is to say that those head coaches would have the same success that they had in the past today: the college game has evolved so much and so has the athlete. Yes, Notre Dame is steeped in tradition, but kids nowadays are not concerned with that and that has to do with our society as a whole. We want instant gratification. Look at the popularity of the SEC and Big 12. Kids would rather be on CBS or ESPN where they get more exposure than NBC which is the home of the Fighting Irish. One of the problems hindering this program is geographical location. Do you see kids wanting to go to Indiana over Texas, Florida, Alabama or USC? If I had a choice, I would pick any Southeastern team or West Coast team. I want to enjoy the nice weather and girls that are in shorts and sundresses instead of girls wearing over-sized sweatshirts and leg warmers. And the academic standards are not going to allow the university to get the athletes that you see at Florida or Texas. Its commendable that they have a high graduation percentage, but if you want to play in BCS bowl games and compete for national titles, something has to give, so what is it going to be? Athletic Director Jack Swarbrick is saying all the right things: “But I think I will say it is important to us to look first and foremost at people who have demonstrated an ability to build and sustain a Division I college football program.” For the Notre Dame fans, let’s hope that he sticks to his plan and make this a meticulous process. As of Sunday, word came out on ESPN that a decision could be made as early as today. I do not know if someone is spreading rumors but if this is true then what happened to the extensive research that he promised. There are 120 college football programs that have qualified personnel, forget about the NFL. Find a college coach that has a good staff and is adept at recruiting and find out his philosophies on the game and where he is planning to take your program. Why pick up a former NFL head coach or assistant that has no experience in recruiting and the college game?! Most importantly, expectations need to be tempered in South Bend, and once they realize that, success can happen. All successful people go through rocky moments in their lives, but one must persevere. And Notre Dame needs to understand that change comes in small chunks; it is not an overnight thing. They need to give whoever they choose as the head coach time to turn around this program: they should not expect nine to ten wins in the first two years. And with the recent departure of Jimmy Clausen and Golden Tate to the NFL draft, it will take some time for that program to be potent on offense. Who knows maybe next season it will be the defense that carries this team or maybe not. My mother always told me that you must creep before you can walk, and once The Fighting Irish realize this then success can come their way.